RoboteQ GB Project

Power wheelchair board for REAL info!

POWERCHAIR MENU! www.wheelchairdriver.com/powerchair-stuff.htm

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 17 Aug 2019, 10:54

I have a set of motors (storm3) if you want some.
And a full control system, bus cables etc. And a programmer...
And a complete unloved chair that runs well (storm3) should anyone want or be interested. Collection only I think...
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Irving » 17 Aug 2019, 11:58

stevelawiw wrote:I wonder if there are more in the latest version that are installed on the chair John had for a while, the last time I looked I couldn't find a part number for them to find out how much they would rush you for a pair :problem: I bet they'd be pricey.

Seems to be 5 versions of GB motors

SP1433561 (lh) SP1433562 (RH) - Storm 3
SP1559356 (lh) SP1559359 (RH) - Storm 4
SP1152666 (lh) SP1152665 (RH) - TDX pre 29/6/15
SP1191490 (lh) SP2191489 (RH) - TDX post 29/6/15
There was an earlier version for Storm 2G/Arrow/Torque chairs c 1998/9 which had a hub rather than the 8" rim. I can't find a part # for them, but I doubt you'd want them anyway.

Allegedly the Storm4 have more torque than the Storm3.

The difference between the TDX motors is the later ones have a slightly wider rim increasing chair width by 0.75".
GB motors were options on TDX - TDX4 & standard on TDX5
C5/6 A (complete)
Puma 40, 75Ah LiFePO4 (pic is on tour @ Whistler, BC)
Puma 40 backup, 73Ah MK (for now)
Spectra Plus (weedy 40Ah MK)
User avatar
Irving
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 11:51
Location: NW London

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 17 Aug 2019, 12:10

Allegedly the Storm4 have more torque than the Storm3.


And about 1/3rd that of a typical 4 pole AT STALL and around the same once rolling slowly. Strange behaviour. I measured 190A on a battery cable repeatedly when doing a zero turn with an empty chair. It lasts around 1 second, then the current and the torque fall away to around a fifth of that. And the motor gets very warm if you try to go left/right indoors, then it stops moving for 20 minutes...

Its a terrible solution. It needs gearing. Because in an attempt to get some level of starting torque they literally murder the batteries. In the same circumstances a typical 20A of current is seen on a geared brushed chair.

On a run, the current is under 2.5A with both motors flat out! The exact opposite. Super efficient once rolling.
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Irving » 17 Aug 2019, 12:46

Burgerman wrote:
Allegedly the Storm4 have more torque than the Storm3.


And about 1/3rd that of a typical 4 pole AT STALL and around the same once rolling slowly. StraNge behaviour. I measured 190A on a battery cable repeatedly when doing a zero turn with an empty chair. It lasts around 1 second, then the current and the torque fall away to aroung 1 fifth of that. And the motor gets very warm if you try to go left/right.

Its a terrible solution. It needs gearing. Because in an attempt to get some level of starting torque they literally murder the batteries. In the same circumstances a typical 20A of current is seen on a geared brushed chair.

On a run, the current is under 2.5A with both motors flat out! The exact opposite. Super efficient once rolling.

It would be interesting to measure/characterise a GB motor.

I agree about gearing. Everything I've read suggests it's the way to go. A good helical planetary gearbox would be >95% efficient and even a 3:1 reduction would give cogging and torque benefits.
C5/6 A (complete)
Puma 40, 75Ah LiFePO4 (pic is on tour @ Whistler, BC)
Puma 40 backup, 73Ah MK (for now)
Spectra Plus (weedy 40Ah MK)
User avatar
Irving
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 11:51
Location: NW London

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 17 Aug 2019, 15:08

I only know of 3 different types of GB Motors the original that Shirley loves because it has a slightly higher top speed, the second which are the ones I know and love and the new ones that haven't appeared yet on the second hand market unless you buy a whole chair for about three grand +
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 17 Aug 2019, 15:53

Theres another. Some have a deeper/shallower wheel rim, and the position of the ridge for the tyre on the drum is different. So... You can use the wrong parts to give a wider tyre J section. Theres around 10mm difference. Not sure which way round it is but I have 2 sets of motors that look very similar, other than this. One set came from the mid drive chair. So you can have a slightly wider or narrower track.
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Irving » 17 Aug 2019, 16:33

Burgerman wrote:Theres another. Some have a deeper/shallower wheel rim, and the position of the ridge for the tyre on the drum is different. So... You can use the wrong parts to give a wider tyre J section. Theres around 10mm difference. Not sure which way round it is but I have 2 sets of motors that look very similar, other than this. One set came from the mid drive chair. So you can have a slightly wider or narrower track.

SHEP_092A.gif

That's the 2 TDX motors I listed. Neither the Storm 3 nor Storm 4 parts lists mention this variation, only the TDX parts list. It's not clear which TDX motor corresponds to the Storm motors, if indeed there is any consistency; you would have thought that Invacare would have used the same parts (and part #) across the board.
C5/6 A (complete)
Puma 40, 75Ah LiFePO4 (pic is on tour @ Whistler, BC)
Puma 40 backup, 73Ah MK (for now)
Spectra Plus (weedy 40Ah MK)
User avatar
Irving
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 11:51
Location: NW London

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 17 Aug 2019, 17:50

Ok thanks, information is power! I think all of mine are the older variant
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Williamclark77 » 17 Aug 2019, 19:00

Irving wrote:There was an earlier version for Storm 2G/Arrow/Torque chairs c 1998/9 which had a hub rather than the 8" rim. I can't find a part # for them, but I doubt you'd want them anyway.

Allegedly the Storm4 have more torque than the Storm3.

The difference between the TDX motors is the later ones have a slightly wider rim increasing chair width by 0.75".
GB motors were options on TDX - TDX4 & standard on TDX5


My first chair after I broke my neck was an old Arrow 2gt (or some similar nomenclature) with the gb motors. Very efficient and fast for a stock powerchair. Unfortunately, it was very weak. Near 0 starting torque. Someone could put their foot in front of the tire and the controller would max out without the chair moving. Stop on a ramp and you had to back down. Once it was rolling it did good. It would not wheelie from a start but would if you were rolling slowly and gave full throttle.

I THINK those motors are still around here stored somewhere. I thought about doing a chair build at 48v with some but they're too big.
WcMade.com - Get nearly anything you need made
Williamclark77
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: 21 Mar 2013, 01:18
Location: South Mississippi, United States

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 17 Aug 2019, 19:46

My first chair after I broke my neck was an old Arrow 2gt (or some similar nomenclature) with the gb motors. Very efficient and fast for a stock powerchair. Unfortunately, it was very weak. Near 0 starting torque. Someone could put their foot in front of the tire and the controller would max out without the chair moving. Stop on a ramp and you had to back down. Once it was rolling it did good. It would not wheelie from a start but would if you were rolling slowly and gave full throttle.


Trust me, the storm 3 and 4 motors are much the same. To me, not usable. And 190 battery amps to turn an EMPTY chair.
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 17 Aug 2019, 20:56

Ok, I know you're right about the lack of torque from a standing start, but I feel I should have a go at defending GB honour :admirer

Silent in use (apart from annoying electronic chatter in a silent room before the brakes engage and turn the motor power off)

Less moving parts (no brushes or gears)

Very efficient once underway

Can't think of anymore!
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 17 Aug 2019, 20:58

There I agree. But that 1 issue made me send mine back and get a refund. It wouldnt reliably turn if you did it say 3 times.
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby hank » 17 Aug 2019, 21:04

Only fault i think with brushless in tight turning spaces there is slight noticable
delay on turn over brushed geared motors
Quickie groove Brushless
BM2.5 clone
hank
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 13:21
Location: Derbyshire. uk

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 17 Aug 2019, 21:09

Maybe that's something using a Roboteq controller with Lenny's script might make a bit better.
I know what you mean tho, when someone is waiting for you to move it can seem like an age sometimes
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 18 Aug 2019, 18:08

Hank have you got the pic of the d-sub connector with the pins numbered please?
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby hank » 18 Aug 2019, 19:29

Steve all i have is what i gave you sorry.
Sure someone can help you. ;)
Quickie groove Brushless
BM2.5 clone
hank
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 13:21
Location: Derbyshire. uk

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 18 Aug 2019, 20:50

Ok Hank, no worries.
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby stevelawiw » 18 Aug 2019, 22:50

Found this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DB13W3
It looks right
pins 7 and 8 arn't used, check
pins 9 and ten are the brake, check
stevelawiw
 
Posts: 664
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 20:55
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby shirley_hkg » 19 Aug 2019, 03:00


youtu.be/F8fpUXcyr7s

We've been travelling in our Chinese way for 2 decades, 50_ish Km a day.

Two grown-ups, chair with T&R dead load itself, with all that belongings and Souvenirs, weighs over 320Kg.

Wife and I went to collect 2 boxes of total 32 EVE-LF105 cells @2kg. Extra 65kg load on chair carrying two adults. That's 360kg.

I pickup and steer right. I can turn on a dime. My chair has the older/weaker torque 8.5mph motors, and IT IS 15 YEARS OLD.

I don't follow BM's aggressive programming entirely.

Could any body explain the different outcomes ?
cheers czy drunk2
shirley_hkg
 
Posts: 3943
Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 13:42

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby shirley_hkg » 19 Aug 2019, 04:06

Head for home, after vacation.

Wife stepped down, and I waited outside a 7-11, Bangkok . hanged
Attachments
IMG-20190819-WA0002.jpg
shirley_hkg
 
Posts: 3943
Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 13:42

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Irving » 19 Aug 2019, 05:08

Wow, those wheel bearings must be pleased when you get home!

@Shirley_hkg Please see viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9104
C5/6 A (complete)
Puma 40, 75Ah LiFePO4 (pic is on tour @ Whistler, BC)
Puma 40 backup, 73Ah MK (for now)
Spectra Plus (weedy 40Ah MK)
User avatar
Irving
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 11:51
Location: NW London

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 19 Aug 2019, 10:44

I think you need a vehicle!
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Scooterman » 19 Aug 2019, 13:18

Shirley - right at the end of the video there's a car parked in the way. Should he not be parked there?
User avatar
Scooterman
 
Posts: 2773
Joined: 03 Jul 2016, 10:11
Location: Camberley England UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Scooterman » 19 Aug 2019, 16:50

shirley_hkg wrote:Wife and I went to collect 2 boxes of total 32 EVE-LF105 cells

Are they the ones with M4 thread?
User avatar
Scooterman
 
Posts: 2773
Joined: 03 Jul 2016, 10:11
Location: Camberley England UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby shirley_hkg » 20 Aug 2019, 03:47

Scooterman wrote:Shirley - right at the end of the video there's a car parked in the way. Should he not be parked there?



This a sub lane, alongside the main road , where one can stops and drop off. But no parking.


youtu.be/XnhM5AUWuhA

Scooterman wrote:
shirley_hkg wrote:Wife and I went to collect 2 boxes of total 32 EVE-LF105 cells

Are they the ones with M4 thread?

Yes,
you are right .

I did find big fat lugs and plan flat base flange lock nuts, that together can give large and firm contact.
Attachments
IMG-20190820-WA0002.jpg
IMG-20190820-WA0003.jpg
IMG-20190820-WA0004.jpg
shirley_hkg
 
Posts: 3943
Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 13:42

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 20 Aug 2019, 06:46

Nothing wrong with 4mm. It just requires a little care and understanding. And not swinging around on spanners like a 200lb gorilla.

I will in 3 weeks like to order a set of those, subject to a) bum/sore issue, and b) money from PPI going into bank.

Can I have a link to accurate measurements of those 105Ah cells?
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Scooterman » 20 Aug 2019, 09:07

Are lugs available that can accommodate a large diameter cable but still have only an M4 bolt clearance hole?

The reason I ask is usually the larger the cable size the bigger the lug bolt clearance hole?

At least that's the way it tends to be in the UK but I'm only familiar with power/mains electrics so perhaps automotive lugs are different? But then it seems everything is available in China. Some of the stuff you post Shirley you'd never get over here.
User avatar
Scooterman
 
Posts: 2773
Joined: 03 Jul 2016, 10:11
Location: Camberley England UK

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 20 Aug 2019, 09:30

Lugs...

Image
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Burgerman » 20 Aug 2019, 09:40

No. You specify the hole size and cable sizes.

Are lugs available that can accommodate a large diameter cable but still have only an M4 bolt clearance hole?
The reason I ask is usually the larger the cable size the bigger the lug bolt clearance hole?


Here for e.g. you can choose 5mm hole (will be ok) and a 10sqmm cable.
For interconnect cables as there 16 cells, you could use 4mm hole (will need drilling to 4.5mm ideally) and 6sqmm cable.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Copper-Tube- ... YmkvRCEr7A
User avatar
Burgerman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 65235
Joined: 27 May 2008, 21:24
Location: United Kingdom

Re: RoboteQ GB Project

Postby Scooterman » 20 Aug 2019, 10:30

What type of cable do you plan on using for the links?

Silicone or pvc stranded?
User avatar
Scooterman
 
Posts: 2773
Joined: 03 Jul 2016, 10:11
Location: Camberley England UK

PreviousNext

Return to Everything Powerchair

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests

 

  eXTReMe Tracker