Thank you, I'm sorry I missed your reply previously, I was busy then doing mechanical mods on my chair.
So in economic terms it's better to pay extra and squeeze in as large a Ah battery as the compartment will allow, so the battery don't get as discharged and you get more cycles out of the battery.
The trouble with me and I think a lot of other laymen, is that we think of batteries as similar to automobile engines. In that it's better for the engine (and exhaust) for the vehicle to be used for lots of long runs, than lots of shorts runs. I remember de-coking my old a-series mini engine and re-lapping the valves, everyone used to do it. I don't know if it did any good? They always used to say to leave a small ring of carbon deposit at the top of the cylinder so you don't lose compression?
For purely economic terms, best to go with Lithium....
If sticking with lead, its more complex... For first approximation, bigger is better, so go with the biggest case (Group) size that will fit, at least usually...
But in a given size, there is a balancing act between internal resistance, and other design issues that makes life more complex... There is a thing called the Peukert effect that essentially says the faster you discharge a given lead brick, the fewer Ah you get... The higher the internal resistance the worse the effect, so you can get some batteries that claim 100Ah in a Group 24 case, which might be true if you were just running a light bulb, but in a chair that draws much higher currents, they have such a high voltage drop that they stop working almost immediately...
So for a given size, internal resistance (lower is better) is almost more important than nominal capacity. This is so true that the much lower resistance Odyssey Group 34 size battery will often outlast the larger group 24 MK Gel in heavy use applications like wheelchair soccer chairs... (Group 34 has the same L x W as Group 24, but is shorter)
At any rate the ONLY two batteries WCD (and even the former not-so-lamented Junky Wheelchair site) has found to be worth purchasing are either the MK-Gel's (NOT the MK-AGM's!) or Odysseys.... In addition to the charge early, charge often rule, we also told people that they could not afford cheap batteries... (I went through a couple sets finding out the hard way how true this is...)
In terms of the engine rebuilds, it was a combination of things - the metals weren't as good (material science is an arcane and evolving art...) probably the gas was worse (the lead in it was there mostly to make up for metal wear) and carbs simply don't offer the same level of precise control over fuel metering that injectors do, so you had to run richer mixes to avoid cooking the engine...
The 'leave a ring at the top' is because the piston rings sit a little below the top of the pistons, so they never clean the top of the cylinder... There would eventually even be a bit of a layer of less worn metal at the top, plus the carbon buildup that formed a sort of 'extra' seal at the top of the compression stroke... In addition, I actually suspect that part of the logic was to keep you from scraping further down and damaging the part of the cylinder that actually did see the rings...
ex-Gooserider