....many British standards where altered/tweaked...particularly threads ... where they where altered from the Imperial 55 degree thread form to a 60 degree thus make the two incompatible.Bubbernator wrote:Hey Expresso- don't let them pick on you about your "Standard" tools. Because they are based on the "Imperial Measurement" system us colonials inherited from our British ancestors.
Burgerman wrote:Why did the americans shrink the gallon?
The wine, fluid, or liquid gallon has been the standard US gallon since the early 19th century. The wine gallon, which some sources relate to the volume occupied by eight medieval merchant pounds of wine, was at one time defined as the volume of a cylinder 6 inches deep and 7 inches in diameter, i.e. 6 in × (3+1/2 in)2 × π ≈ 230.907 06 cubic inches. It was redefined during the reign of Queen Anne in 1706 as 231 cubic inches exactly, the result of the earlier definition with π approximated to 22/7.
Although the wine gallon had been used for centuries for import duty purposes, there was no legal standard of it in the Exchequer, and a smaller gallon (224 cu in) was actually in use, meaning this statute became necessary; it remains the US definition today.
In 1824, Britain adopted a close approximation to the ale gallon known as the imperial gallon, and abolished all other gallons in favour of it. Inspired by the kilogram-litre relationship, the imperial gallon was based on the volume of 10 pounds of distilled water weighed in air with brass weights with the barometer standing at 30 inches of mercury and at a temperature of 62 °F.
...thus bringing the 2 measurements back into alignment.The imperial gill is further divided into five fluid ounces whereas the US gill is divided into four fluid ounces
Burgerman wrote:Why did the americans shrink the gallon?
shouting measurements to my carer to cut wood to size. I said 5 inches 4mm.
or metres either. See above for millimeter lunacy.nobody bothers with centimeters here much.
Return to Everything Powerchair