my iphone which cost $1200 is VERY powerful. it is as powerful as my desktop.
About time for a new desktop. Mine has a single core benchmark thats BETTER than the fastest Apple phone processor below:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing ... l-and-amd/But in realistic workloads I have 16 cores and 32 threads clocked from 3.6 right up to 4.7ghz. And partly because in a lot of the work it uses the very powerful graphics 3090 - also overcocked to assist.
But heres the important bit. My CPU has 16 of these cores and 32 threads. And non of them are the new fangled slower ones that dont multithread used in the latest intel chips for multithreaded stuff. The scores I get on my highly overclocked desktop are massively faster. And 128GB of ram, and a bunch of super fast generation 4, 2 and 4TB NVMe drives as well as a dedicated 3090 nvidia graphics card meanS that its so much more "powerful" than any phone that its not even comparable.
About the only thing that is comparable is the CPU only single thread score. What type of software does that? Only stuff where no real horsepower is needed. And you dont/cant use that on a phone.
Heres the direct geekbench scores.
Apples fastest chip iphone 14 scores.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2592831Which is destroyed by an intel cpu.
https://browser.geekbench.com/processor ... i9-13900ks (not overclocked)
Note that MULTI-THREADED performance is by far the most important here. Although its comprehensively beaten on single thread benchmarks as well.
And remember that these desktop CPUs really should to be paired with a card like nVidia 4090 which is faster and more powerful than the CPU is, for a real high performance computer.
Almost no software today uses single cores anyway that actually needs any cpu power. Things like winzip or winrar for e.g use all 32 threads at 100% on my PC. As does my backup program Macrium. And many other CPU intensive programs like adobe premier. There is little software left that only uses a single thread for anything needing performance. And the operating systems themselves dont either. My CPUs are always using all the cores to a greater or lesser degree. So that having a high single core score is unrealistic and pretty irrelivant in use. What really matters is the multi core benchmarks.
The other thing is that geekbench only sees the CPUs peak speeds. A desktop CPU can run at high speed indefinitely and a phone throttles back to a much slower speed fast. So the specs and this particular benchmark is misleading anyway.
Yes its pretty good for a phones single core benchmark. But you cant do much with a phone. It wont for e.g run anything atually needing a powerful processor anyway. Like my Flight simulator or solidworks (anyone want a copy I have the latest "fixed" version) etc. You need multithreaded performance LOTS more memory, and a suitable graphics card to help with all that. And how much RAM does your phone have? 7GB? But I have 64GB and 128GB and in my PCs. This is common in PCs. For movie editing, and even photo editing and many other things its pretty much essential. And you cant do photo editing or movie editing on a tiny screen anyway... So whats it really for? You also need to move that data. I have a bunch of 4 and 7 GB read/write per second NVMe drives. So very fast data transfer. What does an iphone have?
Seems to me that if you actually have the screen on at proper brightness that didnt keep dimming or going dark and actually USED the CPU hard the battery would last a couple of hours anyway.
My opinion is:
Seems much better to use a phone for phone calls, (£39 for 2 flip phones) and a PC for computing and downloading 4K movies/games/etc on a sensiible sized screen. Different jobs. And a decent camera for photographs. A phone at best does snaps.
But I wont convince you. Its your choice after all! Whatever works for you is fine. Just does nothing for me and costs a fortune (and If you bounce it its toast). Apple = not very repairable and reasuringly expensive and locked down. And I hate its operating system. Android is free, making the phones cheaper but has all the same usage and tracking problems.
Note. I am not saying YOU cant use one! Just that its not for me. And saying its as fast as a desktop is very misleading. It isnt. And it cant do most of the stuff a desktop PC can do anyway.