Burgerman wrote:According to that a 5.1ghz 7700k as I am running, is around 15% slower than a 1k pound chip, doing this one thing, and in nearly every other real world benchmark the 7700k murders it. And for desktop use, and games too. So overall, its not even a close match. And the AMD one is slower by a fair bit. Even the 1800x is not a match for intels multi core workstation/server chip.
So for 99 percent of the time a fast 4 core 8 thread chip is way faster. Disk speed, and memory is a factor too. So unless you run a big complex server setup, its worse generally. Other than you save 1 minute out of 15 with handbrake alone? How much of a working week do you spend doing that?
AMD will release a 16C/32T Ryzen chip for $1,000.
Burgerman wrote:Well don't watch it rip/transcode, line them up, leave it to batch process while you eat/sleep/go out for the day. As the extra few percent shaved off with more cores wont make any real difference. You still get to watch.
Burgerman wrote:Instead, what would be better is board that can take 4 of the 7700k CPU chips...
Burgerman wrote:Thats a good thing though right?
Burgerman wrote:8 core 16 threads, similar.
6 core 12 threads?
On a specific 8 thread task, benchmark.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests