An actual UFO!

[sacharlie]

Trump is now believed to be an Unindicted Felonious Official.

Well that's more probable than little green men.

[Gnomatic]

Little grey men our coming our way ..... Tastes just like chicken they say .....

[sacharlie]

Just watching a Robert DE Niro movie "The Bag Man"(John Cusack was very good) anyway my sister is boycotting DeNiro cause he badmouthed trump. I think DeNiro hates Trump because when portraying a criminal the lines and tempo sound much like Trump and it's not an act.

[Burgerman]

Deneiro hates anything right wing or capitalist because most actors are left leaning progressive social justice warriors...

[sacharlie]

I doubt a right wing social conservative changes underwater more often than once a week.

[Burgerman]

I have no idea what that means. I know what the words mean individually, but fitted together in that order is like nonsense? Sort of a word soup.

[sacharlie]

2 out of 3 now believe trump is lying about the Russia connection.

3 out of 4 Republicans won't admit it but who cares when they don't mind sniffin their shorts.

[Burgerman]

Seriously, who the hell gives a crap? The Russians cant vote. And even if its all true, it just shows he is way more resourceful, and single minded than your communist witch was. So again he deserved to win. And makes a better president.

[sacharlie]

Seriously, who the hell gives a crap? The Russians cant vote. And even if its all true, it just shows he is way more resourceful, and single minded than your communist witch was. So again he deserved to win. And makes a better president.

WOW

[Burgerman]

Seriously, what the hell difference do you think it makes what some idiots put on the web? They cant vote. And the internet is just a toy. And if he did gain some advantage, ask why your communist didn't do the same? Its a load of fuss over nothing because all you liberal/socialists cant accept that you lost!

2 out of 3 now believe trump is lying about the Russia connection.

What they "believe" is irrelevant. You confuse belief with truth. As religous numpties do. And as any sane person can see that doesn't make it true, and in any case who cares as its all bollox anyway.

[sacharlie]

You have a mixed view right/wrong.
So if a criminal is caught he is a criminal but the criminal that is not caught is resourceful.

As to foreign interference well you're weak on that issue also. In reference to Putin killing the 2 Russians in your country with poison. That is an attack on your country but you didn't see it that way either.

You should expand your understanding of all things around you even when those things don't directly poke you in the eye.

[Burgerman]

You have a mixed view right/wrong.
So if a criminal is caught he is a criminal but the criminal that is not caught is resourceful.

No I dont. I never mentioned what is right or wrong. Thats some moral judgment that varies depending on a persons point of view. And yes a criminal thats more resourceful, or cleverer, is less likely to be caught and more likely to be successful. And I still never mentioned anything about right or wrong. You really dont do logic do you. Its not MY opinion, it simply is what it is.

As to foreign interference well you're weak on that issue also. In reference to Putin killing the 2 Russians in your country with poison. That is an attack on your country but you didn't see it that way either.

Is it?
It was an attack IN my country. Which is illegal. Not on my country. If its done as an attack ON MY COUNTRY, and that was the intention, and if it was done by the Russian government, then yes it was an attack on my country. But we dont have any evidence that that was the case. Whats more even if it WAS the Russian government, and we had evidence, the intention was to kill its OWN traitor. Not to attack the UK. That was an unintended side effect of the way some spy killed the Russian guy. Did the russian president know the details? Nobody knows. And was likely a mistake, incompetence, an unintended consequence, a misjudgment and likely not one that the Russian government wanted. So again, I am not "weak" on anything. I just understand logic, the burden of truth, and the difference between an unintended consequence and an attack against the country. And we as a country also do things we shouldn't. And so does the US. If the Russians wanted to attack a country they could do way more damage than killing one of their own, and accidentally hurting 2 others in error. The real answer to the question is complex and nobody knows the real answers. But I wouldn't expect an illogical socialist thats hard of thinking to understand anything complex.

Russians messing about on the internet? I'm t'scared maa...
Do me a favour.
The web is a free for all. If you dont understand it, dont like it, then get off it.

You should expand your understanding of all things around you even when those things don't directly poke you in the eye.

Says the illogical socialist!!!

That doesn't understand the difference between innocence and guilt (legality based on law), competence and incompetency (capability, intelligence, ability etc), right and wrong (a moral judgment and theres no fixed correct position), and resourcefulness and whatever the opposite to this is (typical low IQ socialist???). 4 completely separate categories. Which you randomly stirred together due to ignorance.

[Lord Chatterley]

This is a UFO:


youtu.be/1THwiaXZfzA

Search me what it is...

LC

[Burgerman]

What it is is something we dont know. Thats the correct answer. Not enough info, and it could also be faked rather easily. So its just that. An I dont know.

[Lord Chatterley]

"Aliens" seems a little far-fetched - unidentified seems rather more likely.


youtu.be/EDj9ZZQY2kA

LC

[Burgerman]

We dont know, inadequate evidence or quality of evidence, is the correct answer.

[Lord Chatterley]

We dont know, inadequate evidence or quality of evidence, is the correct answer.

Yup.

LC