Burgerman wrote:And the 3 year remainer time wasting traitor may is now gone.
If the conservatives dont want to be totally destroyed, they must now put in someone that leaves, no deal, immediately, 2 years late. Or farage will be next in power in a few months. Or corbyn, which will totally destroy the economy after approx 4 to 6 years. As always.
And before you start with the parliment must agree stuff, its not true.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... e-minister
It does indicate the level of anger at the referendum result not being implemented but not the level of support for remain. The only way of finding out is a general election and seeing whether the balance between leave and remain MP's changes enough to get a majority in the house one way or the other. With a first past the post system rather than PR that is never easy to predict, you can have strong support but not get seats as UKIP did in the past.
Inevitably it will end up with coalitions either Leave or Remain but should get us out of the stagnation we are currently in. Solves one problem but if it means Corbyn in power adds a bigger one.
The only way to break the deadlock is that general election
and even then you can't trust the manifestos, just non binding political statements which end up as empty promises, at least the Brexit party will be simple. The same goes for the next PM, you can't trust the likes of Bojo, he'll say anything to get the job and renege on it once he has it.
The political system has to change - PR, coalitions and direct democracy for big issues stopping the likes of Corbyn stupidity , real people power only then will we really have control.
Parliament needs to represent the people fairly, and one person should never set the direction, would you seriously want 5 years with Corbyn steering?
We need long term planning not changing from austerity to a socialist state every 5 years. It needs a team of people with vision to provide direction agreed with the people. Decide whether we want Trident or HS2 not politicians. That is taking control.
You maybe need to look at Farage's attendance record, about the worst attendance of any MEP, our representative on EU fishing policy, attended 1 out of 43 committee meetings. If he spent time doing the job he was paid over €100,000 a year for he might have fitted more in. Lost half his salary for using EU money for UKIP staff.
There was a majority of 1.3m from those that voted, that doesn't mean the turnout in a General election will be the same
or that people will vote purely on Brexit stance. More than likely leave voters will and they will have a significant advantage.
We'll have to wait to see if it means they get the majority needed to get it done It should and finally we will be over it and can get on with our lives again.
It doesn't go far enough for me, I don't want the country run by the politicians that we have and distrust anyone who's ego is big enough to think that they can fix our problems. We've started direct democracy we should continue and see what it brings.
Having to vote on how the country is run might get people more interested/educated/involved and feel part of it instead of it being those clowns in parliament. It works in Ireland and Switzerland so why not here?
Burgerman wrote:Having to vote on how the country is run might get people more interested/educated/involved and feel part of it instead of it being those clowns in parliament. It works in Ireland and Switzerland so why not here?
Because that does not worrk.
Half the country are clueless. They will go because they are forced. And vote for whatever they think. The nicest name. The ARROW on the well thought out logo on the recent EU election...
You want the opposite. You want some qualification questions that ask say 3 questions about politics. Basic stuff. If they get that wrong their vote should go in the bin.
That way only those that understand what they are voting for have a vote that counts.
Note ARROW! (put X here...)
Include basic politics and economics in our education system and over time people will be educated.
Burgerman wrote:countless captains? I dont think so.
We just need me in charge.
Burgerman wrote:I asked a door knocking labour candidate which socialist country he would prefer to live in. Blank expression.
I asked him which socialist economic one (place to live) was a good example of sociaalism? Again. Blank look.
I asked what he thought the reason for the economic collapse happening in venuzuala as we were speaking. 100 excuses. but not the real one... That never got a mention.
UIts a waste of time. they *know* socialism, is the way. But they cant tell you why it has always failed every last time. Always it was done wrong...
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests