They are fitted in everything from kids toys, laptops, scooters, chinese BUDGET powerchairs, motorcycles, and model aircraft and helicopters. And full sized cars... Etc. Even in full size electric planes now. TODAY, precisely because apart from being much better they are actually CHEAPER! in real terms, for better performance. They are used because its commertially more sensible and attractive financially. As I easily show below.
He obvciously spotted my new chair and doesent like it! http://www.wheelchairdriver.com/BM-MK3- ... rchair.htm
Or what it represents. It was DESIGNED to show what companies like his SHOULD be doing and wake them up. Even though it has 2.5x the speed and range of his best chairs, with a total build cost as an expensive ONE OFF build by an amateur of about HALF of a typical hi end simple pride powerchair... About 2.5k pounds. Or 4k dollars. We wont mention the off road, short, narrow, build quality, etc here...
From his new "article" explaining why powerchairs are overweight underpowered oversized, unreliable devices as produced by his company :
Another widespread example is consumer frustration that lithium-based batteries aren't standard on power wheelchairs by now. With the buzz in many technologies sectors about lithium-based batteries these days, I receive a flow of feedback from disgruntled consumers thinking that mobility manufacturers are simply lazy, merely not putting such technology in power wheelchairs. However, nothing is further from the truth. Mobility manufacturers recognize that lithium-based batteries can double the driving range, quadruple the battery life span, and charge three-times as quick as conventional batteries. Further, with battery issues like sulfation being among the top service issue with power wheelchairs, lithium-based batteries would increase reliability and increase consumer satisfaction. So, why aren't lithium-based batteries in every power wheelchair?
Again, socio-economics – that's why. The most common rehab power wheelchair battery, a 22NF, is reimbursed by Medicare and Medicaids at a national state average of $125.00. To replicate that battery with lithium-based technology would be in the $1,000 range (the battery industry estimates that it will take around 10 years for the price of lithium-based batteries to drop to 1/3 of today's price, so economies of scale are likewise difficult in today's market even if done in volume). Therefore, the question becomes, if Medicare is funding batteries at $250.00 per pair, and equivalent lithium-based batteries are $2,000 per pair, who's paying for them at approximately 10 times the cost? Insurers won't fund them, and with SSI being the largest income source of those with severe disabilities, where in April of 2011, the average SSI check was $500.80, most consumers can't afford them out-of-pocket. Again, manufacturers would love to put lithium-based batteries in products, and consumers would love to have them, but the socio-economics dictate non-existent funding. (You'll read a few power wheelchair consumers note online that they're using lithium-based batteries, as if they're boasting that they know something that others don't; however, such boasting merely points to the fact that they somehow have more money than everyone else to buy expensive, off-the-shelf technology, where they're privileged not to be living on a scant $500.80 per month, where they're the 1% who are immune from the socio-economics of having a disability in the U.S. today.)
His pricing and therefore total argument is totally incorrect.
A pair of group 24 gel batteries that typically last just 300 real world cycles is about 193 each plus delivery. So 400 UK pounds delivered for what amounts to 100lb in sheer weight, 12 month life used heavily, 300 to 500 cycles. And a 1 hour rate as we use them in bursts of power of about 45Ah or less. See http://www.tayna.co.uk/M24-SLD-G-FT-MK- ... -P721.html But gels are pretty crap under heavy loads so its even less of a difference compared to say a set of odyssey batteries at about £460 delivered!
For say 8 x 60Ah CALB lithiums, to give better energy storage, at the 1 hour rate we use chairs at, to give a MUCH GREATER RANGE as they dont suffer from the peukert affect, 10 to 20 year stand by or storage life, typical 2000 cycles (4x to 6x better cycle life!) the REAL price is around 660 DOLLARS, or 440 UK Pounds. See for proof. http://currentevtech.com/Lithium-Batter ... l-p29.html
About the SAME price!!! Not really more expensive at all!!!
But with better range, faster charging, and FOUR to SIX TIMES the cycle life. Meaning no replacement needed during the typical 5 year life span of a powerchair, and greater reliability. So in reality lighter, more reliable, better range, and 4 to 6 times CHEAPER!!! Which is why they are now used in everything...
My pack huge cylindrical pack was 1200 UK Pounds only because I have choosen to have THREE TIMES THE USABLE WATT HOURS (or stored power) compared to a typical set of group 24 batteries. So it's 3x the cost too. And I use 45v for efficiency reasons and higher speeds. And still its only a fraction over HALF the weight of a pair of lead boat anchor gels!
His argument is absolutely and totally flawed. He doesent understand batteries. Plus economics mean that a wheelchair company can buy scarce not very well marketed or easy to get lithium battries WAY cheaper than I can... But we will ignore that for now.
So realisticaly they are even better than they seem. At about 5 times CHEAPER than a set of gel lead weights, I mean "batteries"... With better performance.
So that article is plain wrong!