by LROBBINS » 16 Jun 2015, 08:38
P&G seems to have a wider market at the moment, but that was not always the case. The R-net and DX2 have similar, obviously not identical, capabilities. If you search in "anything disability" you can find some photos that John posted of a P&G (not R-net, however) power module and my comments about the engineering differences between that and a DX (not DX2) power module - I don't remember whether I posted any pictures. The P&G has half as many MOSFETS, the output connections consist of metal strips pressed into contact by a bit of plastic, and there's no heat sinking. The DX, on top of twice the number of MOSFETS, has output connectors solidly soldered to the circuit board, and a finned, die-cast aluminum case with spring fingers and heat conductive grease between the MOSFETs and the case. Which one do you think will hold up better in heavy use such as power chair hockey? The weakest link in the DX-PM in my experience has been the ISO contactor relay which will probably last many many years in typical use, but may be overtaxed in heavy use especially if power gets turned off while the chair is moving; it's just plain undersized for making or breaking 100 Amps, but in normal use actually switches only with near 0 load across the contacts.
Ciao,
Lenny