Burgerman wrote:Ideally you need oem which they will refuse to sell you. And:
>>>Hopefully they wont charge an arm and a legl
No, testicles.
woodygb wrote:The R-Net software is not ... as far as I'm aware ...dealer level .... the level of access provided by the software is governed by the DONGLE.
The DONGLE comes in at least two types R-net PC Prg Dealer and OEM R-net PC Prg OEM
WDMSetc wrote:ex-Gooserider wrote:There have been some efforts / success at hacking into the input side of the system, i.e. by opening up the joystick pod and splicing into the wiring between the joystick and the controller electronics, but that is kind of sketchy for a lot of reasons. However at least the options of what signals are present and how to tap into them are limited and fairly easy to identify...
I had thought putting a logic/protocol analyzer on the signals to/from these devices could go a long way to capturing the details of the protocol. I imagine the manufacturers DON'T try to "encrypt" their communications but, rather, rely on "security by obscurity" -- just don't TELL anyone what information is being exchanged (but, don't take pains to DISGUISE it, either!) Or, make trivial efforts to hide data (e.g., HP makes a "Secure Web Console" -- did you notice the word SECURE in that description? -- that "encrypts" the traffic that it passes down the network with a simple/trivial substitution cipher: XOR each character/byte with a particular CONSTANT! And this is "secure"???)
If so, conceivably moving the stick left, right, up, down... pressing the horn button... commanding any additional actuators, etc. and observing the data exchanged could go a long way to sorting out what is going on inside the "system".
[People have done far more with systems that were *designed* to be "secure"!]
As mentioned, I will try to pick up some additional "power modules" and "joystick controllers" so I can "sacrifice" a few. Short of deencapsulating actual components, it may be possible to tap into interfaces (e.g., JTAG) that are present to facilitate development and/or production.
I agree that it is probably easier to start from scratch for most of the control stack the way that Lenny is doing. I would consider staying with a good commercial motor controller simply because high power motor control is difficult to do well, and I think that if you avoid leaving more than controlling the basic functions to the controller box, then it shouldn't be terribly hard to switch the box if the existing product gets changed... I understand your concern about getting hosed by surpise changes on the COTS component supplier side, but there is also the tradeoff between full control of the component chain and not simply spending a lot of time reinventing the wheel...
Any vendor on which you rely leaves you vulnerable. Having to redesign *your* system simply because a vendor opted to make a change -- for whatever reason -- to *his* "component" is a terrible way to run a business (even if it's not a business, per se). Vendors seldom tell you, in advance, that a change is coming. And, may implement a change without telling you ("Gee, why do the new chairs all seem to have this problem? Have WE changed something? Let's see... no, not us! Any change notices from our suppliers??")
<snip>
Of the various commercial systems out there, I would say the most "hacked on" here are:
1. The Penny and Giles / P&G / PGDT "Pilot+" series,
I think that is what is present on the chair I currently rescued. The controls bear markings "PGDT".
which is what BM has used on some of his chairs, and for which the OEM level programmer has "escaped into the wild".
Where can I find this? Or, would it not benefit me?
There has been some different projects to modify their electronic innards as well - Woody has built an RC interface that talks to it, and I'm currently working out how to install a speed pot in pods that don't have one.
For the "joystick controller", I think I owuld be happy just to be able to use it as an "input device" -- and not have to repackage my own electronics to fit in that enclosure *just* to have a means of mounting the joystick in a convenient location. But, that assumes there is no "processing" of the joystick's motions within those (PGDT) electronics. Otherwise, it may be easier to just gut the box and lay out a new board that interfaces to the joystick directly.
More or less - there are some details at the edges about the nature of some of the interface connections, or extreme performance tuning, but mostly it's a Ford vs. Chevy sort of thing... There can be some interface details differences that will make a user like one more than the other, but that is a personal preference thing most of the time... Most chair makers will tend to use one system or the other on their chairs (though usually you can specify something else for a price) and often users don't even KNOW what system they are using...2. The Dynamic DX series that Lenny has been using on Rachi's chair, but which needs a proprietary dongle to actually make any programming changes, however there are known places where one can purchase the dongles (though they are not cheap...)
So, there is no advantage/disadvantage to the PGDT vs. Dynamic from a typical user's point of view (unable to "program" *either* of them)
3. It is best to stay FAR away from any Pride / Quantum products, as they are probably the worst in the industry for NOT allowing access to programming tools and information. (not to mention poorer than average build quality and other issues.)
I see I will have to do more research. I had thought Pride was a reseller/dealer -- not a manufacturer. Ditto "Mobility"
woodygb wrote:Whose make of lead ... one of mine?
woodygb wrote:It would seem that the inhibit is either not working or setup differently on the chair that moves with the program cable plugged in .... no big deal just don't forget to disconnect it!
takenaback wrote:I managed to get somebody with some soldering skill to try and fix the cables. Got the Kenwood one working somewhat but it comes up with (TRIPPED) when it is plugged in. I guess this is more than likely a problem with the cable?
Cheers
Return to Everything Powerchair
Users browsing this forum: acid_coke, emilevirus, jehan and 591 guests